Its time to abolish ‘triple talaq’, says Venkaiah Naidu

Date:

New Delhi: Describing ‘triple talaq‘ as anti-constitutional and anti-civilisation, Union Minister Venkaiah Naidu on Saturday said its time the country should abolish this “gender discrimination“, in the light of principles of justice, dignity, and equality.

Triple talaq is anti-constitutional, against law, against the principles of democracy and anti-civilisation.

ALSO READ: Mobile phones banned from Cabinet meetings

This kind of opinion is on the rise. There is a discussion going on, on this subject. Already so much of time has been taken. It is the time the country should move forward to abolish ‘triple talaq’ to end the discrimination and also have gender justice and equality before the law. We should end this,” Naidu said.

“Even Muslim women are demanding justice. There should not be any gender discrimination. There should be gender justice. All are equal before the Constitution,” he said speaking here on the sidelines of a programme organised by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.

He suggested that as the Supreme Court is currently scrutinising the issue, anybody can go and voice their concerns.

ALSO READ: WikiLeaks unveils President Obama’s personal Emails from 2008

On the Uniform Civil Code, he said, “the government will do everything in a transparent manner. It will take Parliament into confidence. Some sections are resorting to a false propaganda that the government is trying to implement Common Civil Code from backdoor.”

On October 7, the Centre for the first time, had opposed in Supreme Court the practise of triple talaq, ‘nikah halala‘ and polygamy among Muslims and favoured a re-look on the grounds like gender equality and secularism.

The Ministry of Law and Justice, in its affidavit, referred to constitutional principles such as gender equality, secularism, international covenants, religious practices and marital law prevalent in various Islamic countries to drive home the point that the practice of triple talaq and polygamy needed to be adjudicated upon afresh by the apex court.

ALSO READ: ADHM Row: Producers promise not to work with Pak actors in future

The law panel’s move was significant as the Supreme Court had recently said it would prefer a wider debate, in public as well as in court, before taking a decision on the constitutional validity of ‘triple talaq’, which many complain is abused by Muslim men to arbitrarily divorce their wives.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Trump Accepts Biden’s Debate Challenge Ahead Of Polls

Trump - who avoided any debates with his rivals for the Republican presidential nomination this year -- said he was "ready to Rumble!!!" "I am Ready and Willing to debate Crooked Joe at the two proposed times in June and September," Trump said on his TruthSocial platform

IPL 2024: RR Continue Downward Spiral In Momentum, Succumb To Five-Wicket Defeat Against PBKS

RR have lost their fourth match in a row and are second with eight wins and five losses, giving them 16 points

School Under Fire After Students Asked To Rate Hitler In Assignment

The assignment was to rate Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler who was in power in Germany from 1933-1945. As per Fox5 Atlanta, the students were given a series of questions which asked them to rate Hitler's characteristics as a leader

CAA: 14 People Given Citizenship Certificates For The First Time

Under the CAA law, the qualification period for citizenship application has been reduced from 11 to 5 years for undocumented non-Muslim migrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan who came to India before December 31, 2014