If you don’t vote, you have no right to blame govt: SC

Date:

If you don’t vote, then you have “no right” to question or blame the government, the Supreme Court has observed. The candid admission of an activist seeking a blanket order to remove encroachments in the country and saying he has never cast his vote did not go down well with the apex court leading it to make the observation.

ALSO READ: Kashmir is core dispute between India and Pakistan: Sharif

The bench, which also comprised Justices N V Ramana and D Y Chandrachud, said it was not possible for it to look into encroachments sitting in Delhi and asked the petitioner to approach different High Courts wherever he saw such encroachments on roads or pavements.

The hard-hitting observation came when Dhanesh Ieshdhan, appearing in person for Delhi-based NGO ‘Voice of India’, said the governments do not do anything to remove encroachments and kept on insisting for a blanket order to remove them from across the country.

ALSO READ: Coldplay extends support to refugee and migrant charity

The bench asked Ieshdhan whether he has voted or not. “To be honest, I have never voted in my life,” Ieshdhan said candidly. This irked the bench which said, “If you have not voted, then you have no right to question or blame the government”.

“We do not have so much power to order a clean sweep of encroachments. If we pass any order, then contempt cases and other petitions will pile up. It’s not possible,” the bench said after the petitioner kept on seeking a blanket order.

ALSO READ: Trump to visit Italy in May

“If you do not move High Courts, we will feel that you are here for publicity,” the bench said and noted in the order that an open-ended direction to remove encroachments will not serve any purpose.

It granted liberty to the NGO to seek remedy state-wise before the High Courts.
On August 26 last year, the apex court, while hearing the plea, had said it cannot order the establishment of ‘Ram Rajya’ in the country and cannot do several things it wanted to due to its “limited capacity”.

ALSO READ: India and Pakistan were on the brink of a Nuclear War

“Do you think with our directions, everything will be done? Do you (petitioner) think we will pass an order that there will be no corruption in the country and all corruption will go? Should we pass an order that there will be ‘Ram Rajya’ in the country? It cannot be like this,” the apex court had then observed.

The NGO had said that in 2014, the apex court had asked concerned authorities to deal with the issue raised it its plea.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

US State Secy Blinken Meets Volodymyr Zelenskyy In Ukraine, Affirms US Support For Kyiv

Kyiv: US Secretary of State Antony Blinken embarked on...

Jackie Shroff Files Petition with Delhi HC to Protect Personality and Publicity Rights

Actor Jackie Shroff has turned to the Delhi High...

SC Refuses To Entertain Plea Seeking Disqualification Of PM For Alleged Hate Speech In Campaigns

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Satish Chandra Sharma allowed the petitioner to withdraw the plea as it was not inclined to entertain the plea

Excise Policy Case: ED To Name AAP As Accused In Liquor Scam

New Delhi: In another setback for the Aam Aadmi...